Zuckerman Ex Rel. Zuckerman v. Coastal Camps, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary judgment was inappropriate because there were questions of material fact regarding the applicability of a statutory exception to immunity from liability for equine activities
• concluding that summary judgment was inappropriate because there were questions of material fact regarding the applicability of a statutory exception to immunity from liability for equine activities
• “When the adequacy of the foundation for the expert testimony is at issue, the law favors vigorous cross-examination over exclusion.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• where “adequacy of the foundation for the expert testimony is at issue, the law favors vigorous cross-examination over exclusion”
• “[T]he inherent risks to equine activities listed in the statute pertain to the unpredictable nature of equine behavior, the unpredictable conduct of other individuals, and certain natural hazards . . . .” (quotation marks omitted)
• “[The expert] was not present at the scene of the accident, and is not in a position to say precisely what happened. Her opinion is necessarily dependent upon the Plaintiff’s ability to prove at trial the facts upon which her opinion depends”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).