Zucker v. WLIB, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The mere expression of an erroneous opinion on a matter of law raises no estoppel, and this is also true where a mistaken opinion is given by an agent of a governmental body which is engaged in administering or enforcing the law in question.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).