Skip to main content
· 7/15/1980

Zucker v. United States Computer Corp.

Citations

  • 408 N.E.2d 41
  • 85 Ill. App. 3d 759
  • 41 Ill. Dec. 695
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In determining whether a garnishment action may lie against the garnishee the form of the action which the debtor could have maintained against the garnishee is irrelevant. What is highly relevant, however, is whether any action could be maintained.”
  • indebtedness is to be measured as of the date of service of the garnishment summons and so if a bank has not had reasonable time to learn of a deposit on the date of the summons, there can be no indebtedness for garnishment purposes
  • indebtedness is to be measured as of the date of service of the garnishment summons and so if a bank has not had reasonable time to learn of a deposit on the date of the summons, there can be no indebtedness for garnishment purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.