Skip to main content
· 11/21/1991

Zucker v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY

Citations

  • 589 So. 2d 454
  • 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11445
  • 1991 WL 241190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that prejudgment interest is \restitution to compensate a plaintiff for the loss of use of its money over the period of time that a plaintiff is wrongfully deprived of the use of that money\
  • in a worthless check action, creditor could only recover prejudgment interest on face amount of check but not on treble damages based on the principle that such interest was restitution and not retribution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goshorn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.