Zubik v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judge did not need to recuse when the judge previously investigated a company with which the criminal defendants were associated because the criminal defendants’ allegations “merely evidence ‘an impersonal prejudice, (going
• holding that a judge did not need to recuse when the judge previously investigated a company with which the criminal defendants were associated because the criminal defendants’ allegations “merely evidence ‘an impersonal prejudice, (going
• if one of two alternatives in a count entirely negates guilt, then guilty verdict may not stand
• prosecutor's comments challenging the failure of defense counsel to offer an innocent explanation for a suspicious conversation involving appellant did not constitute improper commentary on appellant's failure to testify
• Where evidence clearly related only to certain of the seven defendants in conspiracy trial, no severance was required
• when claim is raised for first time on appeal, without findings crucial to creation of factual predicate for its resolution being sought or made in district court, further consideration is inappropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).