Zuberer v. Zuberer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing as premature the challenge to the trial court's ruling on attorneys' fees where the trial court determined entitlement but reserved on the amount
• dismissing as premature the challenge to the trial court’s ruling on attorneys’ fees where the trial court determined entitlement but reserved on the amount
• affirming amended final judgment of dissolution but dismissing ruling determining only entitlement to fees as premature because ruling was nonfinal and nonappealable until trial court determined amount of fees
• affirming the amended final judgment of dissolution of marriage but dismissing as premature the trial court’s ruling only determining entitlement to fees because the issue was “not ripe for appeal” until the trial court determined the amount of the fees to be awarded
• “The trial court’s ruling addressed only entitlement to fees; the issue is not ripe for appeal until it determines the amount.” (citing McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).