Zuber v. Bordier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is legally impossible to attempt to commit [a] reckless” act
• first-degree assault under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 5S3uag-g5s9 v(.a U)(n3it)e ddo Setsa nteost satisfy the 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) force clause
• “Because it is legally impossible to intend to commit a crime that is defined . . . by an unintended result, one cannot attempt to commit reckless second degree assault . . . .”
• a violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a- 60 is not categorically a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) because at least one of its subsections does not constitute such a crime
• “[W]e ‘apply clear error review to a district court’s factual findings regarding the nature of a prior offense,’ . . . .” (quoting United States v. Brown, 629 F.3d 290, 293 (2d Cir. 2011))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).