Z.Q. v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The most significant aspect of the employee’s movement is not that it was merely to a different spot within a room where the robbery occurred.” (emphasis added)
• “[T]he issue on this appeal is not the factual question of what happened to the store employee; it is the legal question whether the physical restraint enhancement applies to the undisputed facts . . . .”
• “[T]he issue on this appeal is not the factual question of what happened to the store employee; it is the legal question whether the physical restraint enhancement applies to the undisputed facts . . . .”
• “[T]he issue on this appeal is not the factual question of what happened to the store employee; it is the legal question whether the physical restraint enhancement applies to the undisputed facts . . . .”
• “[T]he issue on this appeal is not the factual question of what happened to the store employee; it is the legal question whether the physical restraint enhancement applies to the undisputed facts . . . .”
• refusing to apply physical-restraint enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).