Zoltek v. Safelite Glass Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court inferred an \implied-in-fact agreement\ that employee was to receive the same salary regardless of how many hours worked where he had worked fluctuating hours for 30 months for a consistent salary and never protested
• court inferred an \implied-in-fact agreement\ that employee was to receive the same salary regardless of how many hours worked where he had worked fluctuating hours for 30 months for a consistent salary and never protested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).