Zollo v. Turner & Newall Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “examination of the pleadings alone in each proceeding” gave rise to inference of substantial similarity
• disqualifying plaintiffs’ attorney who had previously represented defendants because both actions dealt with nature and scope of Burlington’s control of Patentex
• referring to the \need to maintain the public's trust in the integrity of the Bar\
• disqualifying plaintiffs’ attorney who had previously represented defendants because both actions dealt with nature and scope of Burlington’s control of Pantentex
• referring to the “need to maintain the public’s trust in the integrity of the Bar”
• where public confidence in Bar would be undermined, “even an appearance of impropriety requires prompt remedial action by the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).