Zohoury v. Zohouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting appellants’ argument that some of their dismissals should not count for purposes of OCGA § 9-11-41 (a) because they were duplicative of prior pending actions, and thus, mandated under 7 OCGA § 9-2-5 (a
• “[u]nder USCR 6.2, the trial court had discretion to hear the matter without waiting 30 days for a response”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).