Zoerb v. Chugach Elec. Ass'n, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any error in punitive damage instructions was harmless because the jury found for defendants
• holding that even if the trial court had erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on punitive damages, the error was harmless because the jury found in favor of the defendant and never reached the punitive damages claims
• holding that even if the trial court had erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on punitive damages, the error was harmless because the jury found in favor of the defendant and never reached the punitive damages claims
• where a statute’s meaning appears clear and unambiguous, the party asserting a different meaning bears a heavy burden of demonstrating contrary legislative intent
• statement of Dick Cattanach, member of the task force recommending changes to AS 23.-30.041, that the intent of the task force was to cut the cost of reemployment benefits
• \[S]tanding is not an illusory requirement in Alaska.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).