ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Gartner, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when defendant weighed importance of certain facts differently based on relative value that it assigned to different criteria, rating was nonaction- able opinion
• ‘‘[t]he use of a rigorous mathematical model to generate a ranking . . . based upon [subjective evaluations by vendors and their cus- tomers] does not transform [the defendant’s] opinion into a statement of fact that can be proved or dis- proved’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).