Z.K. Marine, Inc. v. M/V Archigetis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is improper to use “the motion to reconsider to ask the Court to rethink what the Court . . . already thought through—rightly or wrongly” (alteration in original
• “It is an improper use of the motion to reconsider to ask the Court to rethink what the Court already though through—trightly or wrongly.”’
• “It is an improper use of the motion to reconsider to ask the Court to rethink what the Court already thought through—rightly or wrongly.”
• “It is an improper use of the motion to reconsider to ask the Court to rethink what the Court already though through—rightly or wrongly.”
• alterations and 1 Ameritas Variable Life Ins. Co. v. Roach, 411 F.3d 1328 (11th Cir. 2005). citations omitted
• “A motion for reconsideration should not be used as a vehicle to . . . reiterate arguments previously made[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).