Skip to main content
· 2/17/2006

Zivotofsky, Menachem v. Secretary of State

Citations

  • 444 F.3d 614
  • 370 U.S. App. D.C. 269
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3795
  • 2006 WL 355284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[a]nyone whose request for specific information has been denied [under FOIA] has standing to bring an action” and collecting authorities
  • noting in the context of 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(3) that “[a]nyone whose request for specific information has been denied has standing to bring an action”
  • stating that “[a]lthough it is natural to think of an injury in terms of some economic, physical, or psychological damage, a concrete and particular injury for standing purposes can also consist of the violation of an individual right conferred on a person by statute”
  • Under FOIA, “[t]he requestor is injured-in-fact for standing purposes because he did not get what the statute entitled him to receive.”
  • “The requester is injured-in-fact for standing purposes because he did not get what the statute entitled him to receive.”
  • informational injury sufficiently alleged where plaintiff offered “at the least a colorable reading of the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Randolph, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.