Ziv v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that business failure “is not necessarily unexpected, extraordinary, or unusual” and injury from such stress is not covered by the workers’ compensation act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cephas
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-01-20· cited 44×
• Appeal of Letellier
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-12-15· cited 1×
• France v. gila/arizona Counties
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-02-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ford v. Revlon, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 199×
• Cammeron v. Industrial Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-09-23· cited 32×
• Toto v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-02-07· cited 26×
• Eldorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-12-16· cited 17×
• Pima Community College v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-21· cited 15×
• Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-10· cited 15×
• Greenlaw Jewelers v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-12-04· cited 6×
• Owens v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-03-19· cited 6×