Zittleman v. Bibler

Citations

• 2025 ND 87

Syllabus

A party's due process rights were not violated by limiting the time of a hearing and preemptively allocating time to both parties. A district court did not abuse its discretion when it limits the length of a hearing. If a party desires more time for a hearing than a district court has scheduled, the party must object to the time limitations or move for a continuance. A district court is not required to conduct a best interests analysis if it finds there has been no material change in circumstances. A district court is not required to modify a residential responsibility judgment beyond the motion requested by a party.