Zircon Corp. v. Itc

Oral argument

• Argued

  39 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where there was both a charge and a specification setting forth a violation of article 125 of the UCMJ, the Government was required to prove the elements in the statutory text and in the MCM
• declining to “redraft Article 125, UCMJ,” to include a mistake of fact defense “that Congress might have added but did not”
• declining to “redraft Article 125, UCMJ,” to include a mistake of fact defense “that Congress might have added but did not”
• “[A]n 1 On December 20, 2012, the Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard (TJAG
• expressly holding “[t]here is no mistake of fact defense available with regard to the child’s age in the article 125, UCMJ, offense of sodomy with a child under the age of sixteen”
• expressly holding “[t]here is no mistake of fact defense available with regard to the child’s age in the article 125, UCMJ, offense of sodomy with a child under the age of sixteen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).