Zipper v. Health Midwest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment because the appellant failed to present sufficient evidence of one element of promissory estoppel
• “an action for tortious interference with business expectancy will not lie against a party to the relationship with which interference is alleged”
• tortious interference claim against agents of medical corporation could not be sustained where the plaintiff premised his claim on an alleged business expectancy with the medical corporation
• “Here, [Plaintiff] has other remedies at law available that would adequately compensate his injury and, therefore, he has failed to establish the final element required for application of promissory estoppel.”
• “The (Footnote continued on next page.) D-19 For the foregoing reasons, I would affirm the decision of the court of appeals, and so I respectfully dissent. GILDEA, Chief Justice (dissenting
• “Generally, equity will not interceded if an adequate remedy at law exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).