Zinnah Investments, LTD. v. Xylec, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant must show “a reasonable probability that, but for [the error claimed], the result of the proceeding would have been different” (alteration in original
• holding that past convictions under Texas Health & Safety Code § 481.112 cannot trigger the career-offender enhancement
• holding that, on plain-error review, a defendant must “show a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea”
• holding that ”a defendant is obliged to show a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the [guilty] plea.”
• holding that where a defendant fails to challenge his plea in district court, he must establish plain error
• concluding that the standard for the third prong of plain error is the same as the prejudice standard for ineffective assistance claims under Strickland

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).