· 12/22/1954
Zink v. Davis
Citations
- 277 P.2d 1007
- 203 Or. 49
- 1954 Ore. LEXIS 288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘Reformation will be allowed not only as against the original parties to an instrument, but also as against those claiming under them in privity, such as * * * purchasers with notice of the facts.’ ” (quoting 45 Am Jur 623, Reformation of Instruments, § 66)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Latourette, Chief Justice, and Rossman, Tooze, and Perry, Justices
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.