Skip to main content
· 12/22/1954

Zink v. Davis

Citations

  • 277 P.2d 1007
  • 203 Or. 49
  • 1954 Ore. LEXIS 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘Reformation will be allowed not only as against the original parties to an instrument, but also as against those claiming under them in privity, such as * * * purchasers with notice of the facts.’ ” (quoting 45 Am Jur 623, Reformation of Instruments, § 66)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Latourette, Chief Justice, and Rossman, Tooze, and Perry, Justices

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.