Zimmerman v. Summers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that asking permission implies recognition of the owner’s right to prevent the use which is inconsistent with adversity
• noting that asking permission implies recognition of the owner’s right to prevent the use, which is inconsistent with adversity
• noting that asking permission implies recognition of the owner’s right to prevent the use which is inconsistent with adversity
• asking for permission implies a recognition of the right of the owner to stop the use, thus destroying adversity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).