District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/3/2013
Zimmerman v. State
Citations
- 114 So. 3d 446
- 2013 WL 2449591
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8986
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because of a belief that the discovery process was being abused, the Shelton test was erected as a barrier to protect trial attorneys from unnecessary depositions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cohen, Evander, Lawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Eller-I.T.O. Stevedoring Co. v. PandolfoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-17· cited 4×
- eller-i.T.O. v. Pandolfo & Alvarez SarriaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-29
- Alvear Maldonado v. Ernst & Young LLPSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2014-10-27
- Michael Pulwer v. Asante Samuel and Makin Moves 22, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-02
- Sturon, Inc. v. Sturon Nursery, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-09-10
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1986-12-02· cited 374×
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationTenth Circuit· 1995-09-06· cited 184×
- Pamida, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2002-02-25· cited 75×
- Patrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-12-06· cited 59×
- Visual Scene v. PILKINGTON BROS., Plc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-19· cited 32×
- Giacalone v. Helen Ellis Memorial Hospital Foundation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-01· cited 28×
- United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District of Columbia· 2002-08-23· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.