Zimmerman v. Securities & Exchange Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• SEC need not prove intentional conduct or “scienter,” in sense of conduct different from negligence, to establish primary liability for violation of § 13(d) reporting provision
• plaintiff need not proceed against the principal perpetrator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.
  District of Columbia· 2000-06-26· cited 91×
• McGann v. Ernst & Young
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 68×
• Dan River, Inc. v. Unitex Ltd.
  Fourth Circuit· 1980-05-29· cited 57×
• Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1986-01-15· cited 51×
• Drobbin v. Nicolet Instrument Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1986-02-21· cited 36×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1995-06-19· cited 17×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wall Street Publishing Institute, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1984-07-12· cited 11×
• Elliott Graphics, Inc. v. Stein
  N.D. Illinois· 1987-05-18· cited 8×
• Ross v. United States
  District of Columbia· 1986-07-25· cited 3×
• Stewart v. Capitol Area Permanente Medical Group, P.C.
  District of Columbia· 1989-08-17· cited 3×
• Dan River, Inc. v. Unitex Limited
  Fourth Circuit· 1980-05-29· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-12-04