Arizona Supreme Court· 10/12/1983
Zimmerman v. Industrial Commission
Citations
- 137 Ariz. 578
- 672 P.2d 922
- 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- After considering various factors, an ALJ evaluates the evidence presented to determine whether “there is employment reasonably available which the claimant could reasonably be expected to perform, considering his physical capabilities, education and training[.]”
- “After considering all these factors, if the finder of fact can conclude that there is a reasonable probability that the injured worker can find suitable employment on a regular basis, then and only then may it be found that such employment is ‘reasonably available.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Feldman, Gordon, Hays, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Avila v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-05-13· cited 21×
- Landon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-06-09· cited 17×
- Doles v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-12-11· cited 16×
- Roach v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-26· cited 16×
- Tucson Steel Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-10-08· cited 13×
- Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1993-10-14· cited 12×
- D'AMICO v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-04-03· cited 11×
- Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-07-27· cited 11×
- Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-08-30· cited 9×
- W.F. Dunn, Sr. & Son v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-04-25· cited 9×
- Roach v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-26· cited 8×
- Kelly Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-02-08· cited 8×
- Paramo v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-06-04· cited 5×
- Crystal Bottled Waters v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-01-21· cited 5×
- ARIZONA DPS v. Industrial Com'nArizona Supreme Court· 1993-10-14· cited 2×
- MacIas v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 2×
- Macias v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 1×
- Rustin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1996-01-23· cited 1×
- Smith v. adoc/doa Risk ManagementCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-10-29
- Baca v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-01-25
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-02-24· cited 97×
- Davis v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1957-04-16· cited 41×
- Germany v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-09-19· cited 28×
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-23· cited 26×
- Phelps Dodge Corp., Morenci Br. v. Industrial Com'nArizona Supreme Court· 1962-01-31· cited 25×
- Dean v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 17×
- Dye v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-01-21· cited 9×
- Edwards v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-04-28· cited 8×
Other cases named Zimmerman v. Industrial Commission
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.