Zimmer v. Peno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s action for conver- sion, “while satisfying the technical elements of that tort . . . , was properly dismissed as duplicative”
• holding that plaintiff’s action for conversion, “while satisfying the technical elements of that tort, was properly dismissed as duplicative of the insufficient contract claims” (citations omitted)
• finding that analogous term sheet could “not support a claim of breach of contract or of the duty of good faith... ”
• finding that pleading a joint venture establishes a fiduciary duty
• rejecting reference to state of incorporation’s laws when the “fact that a corporate entity was involved was only incidental”
• denying motion to dismiss breach of implied covenant claim where plaintiff “alleged that [defendant] invoked its veto power over the IPO for an illegitimate purpose and in bad faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).