Zilog, Inc. v. Corning (In Re Zilog, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting 8 that Dyer “simply reiterates the well-established proposition 9 that only actual knowledge of the discharge injunction suffices 10 for a finding of contempt”
• noting 8 that Dyer “simply reiterates the well-established proposition 9 that only actual knowledge of the discharge injunction suffices 10 for a finding of contempt”
• noting “substantial possibility” that claims “were not within the women’s fair contemplation until after the April 30 confirmation order, and thus were outside the bankruptcy process.”
• applying fair contemplation test to assess when claims 28 for employment discrimination arose
• “A party 22 who knowingly violates the discharge injunction can be held in 23 contempt under section 105(a) of the bankruptcy code.”
• “A party 22 who knowingly violates the discharge injunction can be held in 23 contempt under section 105(a) of the bankruptcy code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).