Skip to main content
· 5/24/1963

Zigmund A. Milos, Individually and Trading as Milos Ford Sales v. Ford Motor Company and A. W. Kennedy Motor Company

Citations

  • 317 F.2d 712
  • 7 A.L.R. 3d 1162
  • 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5177
  • 1963 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \An attempt to enforce an unambiguous contractual obligation ... can hardly be said to constitute coercion or intimidation.\
  • \An attempt to enforce an unambiguous contractual obligation . . . can hardly be said to constitute coercion or intimidation.\
  • \The argument that termination before expiration [of the franchise agreement] is prima facie evidence of a violation is untenable. The Act expressly conditions recovery of damages on a failure of the manufacturer to act in good faith. Termination in itself does not suffice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw, Smith, Staley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.