Zigan Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, instead of being curtailed, \[t]he water user may choose to develop a plan for augmentation rather than discontinuing the diversion\
• “Since evaporation from the ponds was one such effect and since the proposed plan for augmentation made no provision for compensation for evaporative losses incident to reclamation use, the trial court properly denied approval of the plan.”
• Gravel pit owner was required to replace evaporation losses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).