Skip to main content
· 4/1/1992

Ziff v. Stuber

Citations

  • 596 So. 2d 754
  • 1992 WL 63108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a notice of appearance constitutes a non-responsive paper
  • finding that a notice of appearance constitutes a non-responsive paper
  • court clerk could not properly enter a default pursuant to plaintiff's application after the defendant filed a paper requesting the trial court for additional time to respond
  • “The filing of a nonresponsive ‘paper’ filed as a delaying tactic, such as a notice of appearance, is an abuse of process supporting a default entered by the court under subsection (b) of the rule without notice of hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.