Zielinski v. Wayman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing child endangerment counts for marijuana possession because “the potential harm to the child cannot be merely remote or speculative in nature”
• dismissing child endangerment counts for marijuana possession because \the potential harm to the child cannot be merely remote or speculative in nature\
• granting a motion to dismiss, finding that merely having marijuana in an apartment with a child present was not sufficient to sustain the charges
• dismissing endangerment charges on the basis that \the mere presence of mari[j]uana alone\ in an apartment with children present is not enough to show a likelihood of harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).