Skip to main content
· 8/8/2006

Zielinski v. Kotsoris

Citations

  • 901 A.2d 1207
  • 279 Conn. 312
  • 2006 Conn. LEXIS 287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no genuine issue of material fact as to whether statute of limitations was tolled under either doctrine
  • isolated and discrete consultative services “will not, without more, give rise to a . . . treatment relationship for purposes of tolling the statute of limitations”
  • no genuine issue of material fact as to whether statute of limitations was tolled under continuing course of treatment or continuing course of conduct doctrine
  • “separate and isolated contacts with different [employees] who have the same employer” insufficient to give rise to continuing course of conduct
  • “separate and isolated contacts with different [employees] who have the same employer” insufficient to give rise to continuing course of conduct
  • “[U]nder the continuous treatment doctrine [a tolling doctrine], the term malpractice itself may be applied to a single act of a physician or surgeon or, again, to a course of treatment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Norcott, Palmer, Vertefemlle, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.