Ziegler v. United States Gypsum Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the husband’s right to recover for loss-of-consortium damages is “based upon the wife’s right to recover for her direct injuries”
• stating that husband has no cause of action for consequential damages if defendant is not guilty of tort that would give right of action to injured wife
• referring to loss of consortium as consequential damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).