Zidron v. Metts

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 1118

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed. Because the evidence demonstrated that the doctor was not engaged in clinical teaching when she rendered treatment to the plaintiff-patient, the doctor was acting manifestly outside the scope of her State employment and was therefore not entitled to personal immunity under R.C. 9.86 and R.C. 2743.02(F). The Court of Claims did not shift the burden of proof to the doctor.