Zibtluda, LLC v. Gwinnett County Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that municipality may rely on “the experience of other cities, studies done in other cities, caselaw reciting findings on the issue, as well as the officials’ own wisdom and common sense”
• stating that, for “the second step of the Renton inquiry . . . the key question is whether the county has demonstrated that the purpose of the [ordinance] is to combat negative secondary effects of adult businesses”
• upholding an ordinance based on its statement of purpose, which cited to experiences of other counties and municipalities, documentary evidence, and oral testimony
• “The Supreme Court has made clear that when the purpose of an adult entertainment ordinance is to ameliorate the secondary effects of adult businesses, intermediate scrutiny applies.”
• “[A]lthough these ordinances are not strictly content-neutral, they are simply treated as such.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).