Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ased on the de minimis character of the alleged encroachment and the complete absence of any evidence to support the appellant’s claim for damages, the Supreme Court properly declined to award the appellant any damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Averaimo v. Tavares
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-03-20· cited 4×
• Krakovski v. Stavros Assoc., LLC
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2019-06-26
• Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wing Ming Properties (U.S.A.) Ltd. v. Mott Operating Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1992-05-07· cited 13×
• Generalow v. Steinberger
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-06-15· cited 12×
• Hoffmann Investors Corp. v. Yuval
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-10-24· cited 9×
• Robert v. Kohs
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-12-07· cited 1×

Other cases named Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-10
• Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-10