Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin
Citations
- 58 A.D.3d 746
- 871 N.Y.S.2d 675
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[B]ased on the de minimis character of the alleged encroachment and the complete absence of any evidence to support the appellant’s claim for damages, the Supreme Court properly declined to award the appellant any damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Other cases named Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.