Zhuang Li Cai v. Uddin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find defendant’s representations “that this was a good horse for children” were puffery as a matter of law
• “Whether representations made by a seller are warranties and, therefore, a part of the bargain, or merely expressions of the seller’s opinion, or mere ‘puffing’, is almost always a question of fact for a jury’s resolution.”
• false representations that a horse was “quiet and easy to handle” and would make a “good horse for a youth,” while sufficient to support a claim for fraud in inducing the purchase of the horse, did not constitute conduct sufficient to warrant punitive damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).