Zhou v. Zhou

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that such a reconciliatory construction gives full effect to the expressed legislative intent
• holding that a circuit court could not use Code § 8.01-428(B) to vacate and reissue a -9- final order, thereby granting a party additional time to file a notice of appeal, after realizing that a procedural error deprived the parties of “notice” of the order’s original entry
• holding that a circuit court could not use Code § 8.01-428(B) to vacate and reissue a -9- final order, thereby granting a party additional time to file a notice of appeal, after realizing that a procedural error deprived the parties of “notice” of the order’s original entry
• observing that \basic canons of statutory construction\ exclude interpretations rendering statutory language \superfluous\
• noting that when multiple provisions of a statutory scheme “‘suggest a potential for conflict or inconsistency,’ we must construe such ‘provisions so as to reconcile them’” (quoting Herrel v. Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 579, 585 (1998))
• noting that Code § 8.01-428(B) “provides the trial court with the authority . . . to correct ‘clerical mistakes’ in its decree or errors in the record so as to cause the acts and proceedings to be set forth correctly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).