Zhou v. Division of Family Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disclosure requirements comport with the First Amendment “as long as [they] are reasonably related to the State’s interest in preventing deception of consumers” (emphasis added)
• recognizing that disclosure requirements aimed at misleading commercial speech need only survive rational basis scrutiny, by being “reasonably related to the State’s interest in preventing deception of customers”
• recognizing that disclosure requirements aimed at misleading commercial speech need only survive rational basis scrutiny, by being “reasonably related to the State’s interest in preventing deception of customers”
• holding that where appellant was put on notice of disciplinary charges against him and was afforded opportunity to respond to board's recommendation, demands of due process were satisfied
• concluding that an attorney’s advertisements to represent DUI defendants and users of an intrauterine device were purely commercial speech
• holding that where appellant attorney was put on notice of disciplinary charges against him and was afforded opportunity to respond to board's recommendation, demands of due process were satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).