Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is ‘irrefutable’ that [the Indian import statistics are based on] a ‘broad, basket’ tariff provision”
• cautioning that, “on remand, Commerce should be mindful that, when valuing an intermediate product in [a non-market economy] case, it must find a surrogate value representative of that intermediate product ”
• recognizing Commerce’s discretion to rely on intermediate input methodology under certain circumstances
• explaining that “data indicate that 'the highest quantity of imports ... driv[ing] the price of [merchandise classified under HTS subheading 3923.3090] is imported from Italy by L'Oreal India Pvt. and is described as ‘hair products' ”
• rejecting Commerce’s cursory presumption that Info-drive data were unreliable without “even a scintilla of evidence of manipulation or distortion or affiliation”
• analyzing merits of domestic price quotes versus Indian import statistics for valuation of plastic jars and lids

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).