Zheng v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the BIA must actually consider the evidence and argument that a party presents” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• explaining that the BIA has “ ‘a duty to explicitly consider any country conditions evidence submitted by an applicant that materially bears on his’ ” or her claim
• remanding because the BIA \fail[ed] to discuss most of the evidentiary record\ for both petitioners
• vacating denial of motion to reopen where the BIA “did not mention” numerous documents included in the petitioner’s motion
• finding abuse of discretion where the BIA did not mention Petitioner’s affidavits, city letters, or other documents submitted by Petitioner
• remanding where BIA failed to discuss, inter alia, evidence that pre-dated one petitioner’s final order of removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).