Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarizing plaintiff’s argument that Commerce used data that were not for brass bar when the relevant FOP was for brass bar, but ultimately concluding that the record did not establish that data were products made of other metals
• “[I]t is clear that Commerce can only use facts otherwise available to fill a gap in the record.”
• “[I]t is clear that Commerce can only use facts otherwise available to fill a gap in the record.”
• “Commerce is . . . required to verify all information relied upon in making its final determination.”
• “We cannot say, therefore that no reasonable mind could conclude that Commerce calculated the surrogate value as accurately as possible.”
• the court looks “to the record as a whole, including evidence that supports as well as evidence that fairly detracts from the substantiality of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).