· 6/26/2014
Zhanjiang Guolian Aquatic Products Co. v. United States
Citations
- 2014 CIT 73
- 991 F. Supp. 2d 1339
- 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 637
- 2014 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 69
- 2014 WL 2884149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed.”
- “[T]he fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed.”
- “the fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed”
- “[T]he fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed.”
- “Speculation of an administrative reversal is hypothetical, and hypothetical harm cannot provide jurisdiction.”
- “[T]he United States Constitution does not permit courts to issue advisory opinions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.