Skip to main content
· 6/26/2014

Zhanjiang Guolian Aquatic Products Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 2014 CIT 73
  • 991 F. Supp. 2d 1339
  • 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 637
  • 2014 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 69
  • 2014 WL 2884149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed.”
  • “[T]he fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed.”
  • “the fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed”
  • “[T]he fact that no CVD order has been issued means that Plaintiff is not suffering any injury due to the errors it alleges the ITC committed.”
  • “Speculation of an administrative reversal is hypothetical, and hypothetical harm cannot provide jurisdiction.”
  • “[T]he United States Constitution does not permit courts to issue advisory opinions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.