First Circuit· 10/2/2020
Zhakira v. Barr
Citations
- 977 F.3d 60
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a - 12 - petitioner's asylum claim failed because the proposed PSG did not satisfy one of the three PSG requirements
- concluding that BIA correctly rejected political asylum claim where petitioner had \taken 'no actual political action'\ and \identifie[d] no evidence indicating that [persecutors] would be aware of his political views\
- affirming BIA's denial of asylum seeker's political-opinion claim where applicant had \taken 'no actual - 10 - political action'\ and \identifie[d] no evidence indicating that Al-Shabab would be aware of his political views\ (emphases added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 242×
- Mendez-Barrera v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-04-15· cited 92×
- Ahmed v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-07-13· cited 61×
- Paiz-Morales v. LynchFirst Circuit· 2015-07-29· cited 47×
- Martinez-Perez v. SessionsFirst Circuit· 2018-07-24· cited 27×
- NAKO v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-07-07· cited 23×
- Aguilar de Guillen v. SessionsFirst Circuit· 2018-08-27· cited 23×
- De Carvalho Frois v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2012-01-26· cited 16×
- Gao v. BarrFirst Circuit· 2020-02-20· cited 10×
- Rivas-Duran v. BarrFirst Circuit· 2019-06-17· cited 9×
- Ramirez Perez v. BarrFirst Circuit· 2019-08-13· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.