Zguris v. K-Mart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CAT applicant must provide some evidence “that someone in his particular alleged circumstances is more likely than not to be tortured” (emphasis omitted)
• holding that an applicant for CAT relief must show a likelihood of torture in “his particular alleged circumstances”
• holding that beyond general country conditions evidence demonstrating incidents of torture in a country, an applicant for CAT relief must provide some evidence “that someone in his particular alleged circumstances is more likely than not to be tortured” (emphasis omitted)
• explaining that an applicant must show a likelihood of torture in “his particular alleged circumstances”
• noting that an applicant for CAT relief must establish that someone in his “particular alleged circumstances is more likely than not to be tortured” (emphasis original)
• explaining that “more likely than not” means “that there is greater than a fifty percent chance . . . that [an applicant] will be tortured” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).