· 8/26/1988
Zervas v. Nix (In Re Nix)
Citations
- 92 B.R. 164
- 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2491
- 1988 WL 112598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “... it is clear from the jury issues and answers ... that the facts in question were actually litigated and that such facts were necessary to the final judgment”
- “As to the first element, that the issues involved in the prior suit be identical to those of the present proceeding, an examination of the jury issues and answers are necessary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert McGuire
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.