Skip to main content
· 8/26/1988

Zervas v. Nix (In Re Nix)

Citations

  • 92 B.R. 164
  • 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2491
  • 1988 WL 112598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “... it is clear from the jury issues and answers ... that the facts in question were actually litigated and that such facts were necessary to the final judgment”
  • “As to the first element, that the issues involved in the prior suit be identical to those of the present proceeding, an examination of the jury issues and answers are necessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert McGuire

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.