Zerr v. HECETA LODGE NO. 111, IND. ORDER OF ODD F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing an order requiring removal of encroachment and affirming the award of nominal damages for the resulting easement where landowners offered insufficient evidence of actual damages
• limiting an encroaeher’s interest in the disputed land to an easement so that [the encroached upon party] can recover possession of the land in the event that the structure is removed in the future
• encroachment of nine inches, no mandatory injunction where no substantial damages
• encroachment of nine inches; no mandatory injunction where no substantial damages
• test for enforcement by mandatory injunc- tion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).