Zero Food Storage, Inc. v. Henderson's Sea Food, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence was - 10 - J-S41013-20 sufficient to establish a conviction under section 3802(d)(2)
• stating that “subsection 3802(d)(2) does not limit, constrain, or specify the type of evidence that the Commonwealth can proffer in its case.”
• holding the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant’s Section 3802(d)(2
• “Pursuant to our general standard, a need for expert testimony arises when the jury is confronted with factual issues whose resolution requires knowledge beyond the ken of the ordinary layman.” (emphasis added) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• evidence was sufficient to support conviction for DUI under Section 3802(d)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).