Zepp v. Mayor & Council of Athens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that water is a “good” as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code
• stating that it does not find Coast Laundry v. Lincoln City, 9 Or.App. 521, 497 P.2d 1224 (1972) compelling, and that “[wjater, like electricity is a thing; it exists; it is ‘fairly identifiable’ as a movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale”
• sale of water was sale of goods within the purview of the UCC
• “[T]hat which the law itself specifically permits cannot be ‘unconscionable.’ ”
• sale of water is a sale of goods under UCC
• conducting Article 2 scope analysis before proceeding to unconscionability issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).