Zepf & Co. v. Dye

Citations

• 16 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 443

Syllabus

<p>Attachment and Garnishment — Goods May Fall Within the Class of Necessaries — But Claim of Seller Not he Maintainable Thereunder.</p> <p>A claim by a merchandise broker, who has loaned his credit to one desiring to purchase goods by giving to such person an order on some merchant for the goods desired, and who never saw the goods himself, is not a claim for necessaries within the meaning of Section 10253, General Code, notwithstanding the goods so purchased fall within that class.</p>