Zeno v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by not arguing that inserting the conjunction \or\ between codefendants' names in the jury instructions on the essential elements of the charged offenses constituted fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dooley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-14· cited 5×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16· cited 4×
• Barnes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-16· cited 2×
• Santiago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-17· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-03· cited 38×
• Ortiz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-01· cited 23×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-05· cited 22×
• Concepcion v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-03· cited 20×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-27· cited 17×
• Zeno v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-21· cited 17×
• Kist v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-13· cited 5×